Legislative
Correspondence
2004 Florida Legislative Session
Re: SJR 2178 -
Parents'
Right to Notice
![]()
March 30, 2004
|
FLORIDA
CATHOLIC
CONFERENCE |
|
March 30, 2004
«First_Name» «Last_Name»
«Local_Street_1»
«Local_City», FL «Local_Zip»
RE: Parents’ Right to Notice
Dear Senator «Last_Name»:
We are unable to support SJR 2178 in its present form,
though we are appreciative of the efforts of Senator Diaz de la Portilla and
other Senators to bring the language more in conformity with the House version.
As we continue to work with the sponsor and others, we take this
opportunity to share some of our concerns as indicated below:
1.
Parental notification does not prevent the minor from having an abortion.
It would require the physician to notify her parent or guardian of her
intentions to have an abortion. This
amendment is not about consent, only notification.
Florida’s parents deserve at least this.
If they cannot be assured of a clear, clean amendment from the
Legislature, they will be better off with none.
2.
We are opposed to adding unnecessary language more appropriate to the
Statutes into the Florida Constitution. If
future court cases expand or restrict abortion, the legislature could not change
the Constitution.
3.
We cannot support language that has uncertain meanings or
interpretations. Keeping the
constitutional amendment concise, limiting it to notification while protecting
privacy rights, is accomplished in HJR 1 and can be achieved in SJR 2178.
4.
Putting rape or incest in the Constitution is unwarranted. It is our
belief that parents deserve to know if their children are the victims of the
crime of rape or incest. If the father or guardian is guilty of incest, a mother
deserves to know. We do support
properly drawn exceptions and judicial by-pass provisions in Statute.
Life of the mother and other emergency exceptions must be addressed in
Statue.
5.
We must not abandon parents in Florida who deserve to have a clear and
concise constitutional amendment providing that they may be notified in the case
of their child’s abortion.
6.
The amendment should use the term “abortion” and not “termination
of pregnancy”. Termination of
pregnancy occurs by live birth, miscarriage, or induced abortion.
This amendment seeks to address abortion only and not live birth or
miscarriages.
Please pass a clean constitutional amendment with a clear
summary.
Sincerely yours,
Sheila S. Hopkins
Associate for Social Concerns
SSH:ds
|