COMMENTARY
FLORIDA CATHOLIC CONFERENCE
Archdiocese of Miami + Diocese of St. Augustine + Diocese of St. Petersburg + Diocese of Orlando + Diocese of Pensacola/Tallahassee + Diocese of Palm Beach + Diocese of Venice
VOLUME 14, NUMBER 2 / May 1995
![]()
Reform of the Welfare System |
| Amen, I say to you, whatever you did for the least of these brothers and sisters of mine you did for me. Matthew 25:40. |
The Catholic Church in Florida
has been involved for generations in the care of poor families and children. Our parishes
and Catholic Charities (Catholic Social Service) agencies continue to lead in community
care and in the protection of the poor. We are all called to protect the poor, the
vulnerable, and the oppressed. "The Church would not be faithful to the Gospel if we
were not close to the poor and if she did not defend their rights." (John Paul II,
Centesimus Annus, 1991)
In Economic Justice for All, A Pastoral Letter of the National Conference of
Catholic Bishops, we stated with our fellow bishops:
Before discussing direction for reform in public policy, we must speak
frankly about misunderstandings and stereotypes of the poor. . . . It is frequently
suggested that people stay on welfare for many years, do not work, could work if they
wanted to, and have children who will be on welfare. In fact, reliable data shows that
these are not accurate descriptions of most people who are poor and on welfare. . .
. We ask everyone to refrain from actions, words, or attitudes that stigmatize
the poor, that exaggerate the benefits received by the poor and inflate the amount of
fraud in welfare payments.
Poverty: Any meaningful welfare reform must seek to eliminate poverty. Our
Florida pastoral letter of 1985, Social Concerns of Florida, stated:
It is false and cruel to presume that the poor want to be poor, that they are just lazy, or that they are happy in their poverty. Poorly nourished as children, without adequate education....where defeat, hopelessness, and crime are like the air they breathe, without job opportunity, they are trapped in a circle of poverty that they inherit and hand on to their children.
It was not the poor who created
poverty. The decline of morality in our society has tended to diminish the importance of
marriage, intact families, sexual abstinence among minors, and a living wage. Government
policies have exacerbated these trends in many ways. Reform is called for, but it must be
positive reform. A meaningful welfare reform ought to provide able bodied recipients with
education, job training and supportive services, such as, financial assistance, child
care, housing, health care, and transportation, that will lead to jobs that provide
adequate support for families. To combat poverty, employment opportunities should exist
that provide a just wage for those who are able to work. Solidarity must be promoted in
both the public and private sectors to generate jobs at a fair wage, which in turn, will
reduce the need for welfare programs and give individuals human dignity and self worth.
Family: Welfare reform ought to promote the intact family, nurture
children, provide adequate health care, childcare, and affordable housing. We, as a
society, have an obligation to make certain that children are nurtured and loved, that
marriage and parental responsibility is valued and the preservation of the family is made
a priority. All persons, young or old, should be assured of the basic necessities of life
- -food, shelter, health care and education. There are great needs now, under current
policies, such as:
The expansion of subsidized childcare programs. The State of Florida has a
waiting list of over 23,000 children in need of childcare. (Florida Department of Health
and Rehabilitative Services, 1994) Additional childcare availability is needed for AFDC
children, as well as, children of the working poor and those eligible families served by
the community and church.
Parental choice in education. The ability of poor parents to choose freely
the type of education they desire for their children, assures the right of all children to
equality of educational opportunity.
Concentration on abstinence based sex education programs which stress respect for
self, for family and for the rights of others, as a means of reducing teenage pregnancy
and sexually transmitted diseases.
Policies which are pro-life and do not coerce or encourage abortion. A family
should not be penalized for having an additional child born while receiving benefits.
Tolerance of immigrants. Joseph and Mary took Jesus with them as immigrants to
Egypt, almost all of us or our forebearers came here as immigrants, and yet, some of the
worst periods in our nation's history have been marked by bigotry and discrimination
against immigrants; and it is rising again. This spirit should not be injected into the
reform of the welfare system.
Public Policy: We urge public officials at both state and federal levels
to adopt the following principles in their efforts to reform the welfare system:
* Government has a proper role in assuring adequate nutrition, clothing, housing and
health care to poor children and people in need, and in discouraging dependency in those
capable of being independent.
* The family is the basic unit of society. Welfare reform should affirm the value of
intact families, personal responsibility and sexual restraint; it should respect human
dignity and the intrinsic worth of each and every person. No family should ever be
penalized for giving birth to and nurturing a baby while receiving benefits.
* The well-being of children must be a major priority in any reforming of the welfare
system and in dealing with families. Single parent families and extended families raising
children in the absence of one or both parents, need continued support and recognition.
* Financial benefits and community support services are needed to enable people to
make the transition from welfare to work, and to then maintain self-sufficiency.
* Strong child support enforcement is essential for a successful social welfare system
in today's world, as is the encouragement of responsible parenting.
* There are people unable to support themselves, for whom society has historically
provided, going back to biblical times. Rigid times should not be applied to terminate
welfare benefits, e.g. (AFDC) for a person unable to maintain self sufficiency due to age,
disability, sickness or lack of job opportunity.
* Immigrants in Florida should not be discriminated against in the reform of the
welfare system, and should not be made scapegoats for society's problems. Undocumented
aliens are excluded from most welfare programs today, but especially health services and
education for children should continue to be furnished.
Conclusion: Catholic social teaching calls us to protect the poor and to
speak for those who can not speak for themselves. We must involve ourselves in parish and
community programs that reach out and help the poor and those in need. Cycles of poverty
and dependence on welfare will never be overcome unless communities become involved. Thus
we call on our Catholic people, and all people of good will to become involved in parish
ministry programs and community efforts that reach out to those in need; to become
informed on the issues, especially welfare reform, both state and nationally; advocate for
just reform by writing, calling, or seeing their Representative and Senator in the
Congress and the State Legislature; and most of all, to recognize that we are called upon
to put our trust in the Lord, and to pray, sacrifice and love, love those in need, those
who agree with us, and those who disagree with us. May God grant us His peace.
Most Reverend John C. Favalora, D.D.,
S.T.D.
Most
Reverend Norbert M. Dorsey, C.P., D.D., S.T.D.
Archbishop of Miami
Bishop
of Orlando
Most Reverend John J. Snyder, D.D.
Most
Reverend John M. Smith, J.C.D., D.D
Bishop of St. Augustine
Bishop
of Pensacola-Tallahassee
Most Reverend John J. Nevins, D.D.
Most
Reverend Agustin A. Roman, D.D., V.G.
Bishop of Venice
Auxillary
Bishop of Miami
Most Reverend J. Keith Symons, D.D.
Bishop of Palm Beach
February,
1995