Human Cloning
A Position
Paper of the
Florida Catholic Conference
THE ISSUE
There are documented
attempts to clone humans, either for reproductive or so-called
“therapeutic” (experimental) purposes. The cloning process currently
being debated is technically known as “somatic cell nuclear transfer.” It
involves removing the genetic material (nucleus) from an unfertilized
female egg or ovum (with 23 chromosomes) and replacing it with genetic
material from another human cell (a somatic cell with 23 pairs
of chromosomes – all the genetic material needed to develop into a
person). Legislation to regulate this technology has been proposed at
both federal and state levels.
FCC POSITION – Opposition to Human Cloning
The
Florida Catholic Conference is opposed to human cloning. We stand with
many others who do not view cloning as a worthy way to bring a human being
into the world. From a biological standpoint, the formation and the
development of the human embryo, regardless of how conceived, constitutes
a new human organism who has embarked upon the path of human development
that leads to natural death. Public policies must recognize, respect and
care for life and prevent abuse of it.
Plant & Animal Cloning
Cloning of plants and animals or portions of human DNA, when used for the
betterment of humanity is not objectionable and may even be desirable
under proper guidance. It should be regulated with the greatest of care
and highest ethical standards.
So-Called “Therapeutic” Cloning
So-called “therapeutic” cloning, in which embryos are created (or
“reproduced”) and used for development of stem cells, relies upon a
utilitarian approach to bioethics. We disagree with arguments which
attempt to justify human cloning, as they fail to recognize the dignity of
newly-established humanity in the earliest stages of growth. In an
attempt to act under the duty of beneficence – “to do good,” they neglect
the duty to “do no harm,” non-maleficence.
Alternative Approaches
From a purely
practical standpoint, we note that studies have shown that other sources
of stem cells are available, such as adult tissue, placentas and umbilical
cord blood. These have been shown to be much more efficacious than
originally expected and do not involve moral objections. To this point, no
effective treatments exist that are derived from destruction of human
embryos.
Consistent Ethic of Life
A consistent ethic of life should be applied to cloning, just as it
applies to abortion and assisted suicide. From a moral perspective, we
are opposed to cloning of another human being because:
Science &
Ethics
All technological
improvement carries with it a responsibility to use it for the betterment
of humanity. Clear public policy is needed to establish guidelines for
the intentions of scientists, doctors and others involved in this area.
Faith Perspective
From a faith perspective, God's dominion over creation is a perspective
shared by Christians, Jews, Muslims and others. Human beings are free to
be responsible stewards of God's gifts. We must continue to protect that
freedom from unrestricted technology.
For Additional Information:
1.
Do No Harm: The
Coalition for Research Ethics:
http://www.stemcellresearch.org/.
2.
The United States
Catholic Conference fact sheets on cloning and reproductive technology:
http://usccb.org/prolife/issues/bioethic/factsheets.htm
3.
The Florida Catholic Conference’s website page devoted to stem cells
research:
http://www.flacathconf.org/StemCellResearch/StemCellInfoSummary.htm